Mike Jones Digital Basin
screen media rinse cycle


« July 2009 »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   
1
2
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
20
21
22
23
25
26
28
29
31
 
       
Today

Blogroll

Newsfeeds

Controls

 
Saturday Jul 18, 2009
 

Loving digital for its beauty not just its practicality

For too long the distinct Colour, Grain, Artifacts, Judder and Flicker of celluloid film had been praised and celebrated as somehow the epitome of 'cinema'. That these defects in the celluloid image were somehow what made cinema organic, special, magical....

As digital arrived and grew, it's potency was celebrated in terms of Cost, Efficiency, Flexibility. For sometime now movies have been shot digital because of practical and logistical concerns but rarely for aesthetic ones. Subsequently the much voiced pursuit of  digital camera hardware was to achieve "the look of film, with the flexibility of digital"...

This is a profoundly short-sighted view. Those who see Digital only as a logistic advancement rather than an aesthetic one are failing to see the future beyond their nose, failing to possess any vision for what could be?

Take a long hard look at this footage from the BBC. 



This incredible image sequence, that seems to present a reality more Real than Real, a hyper-reality that is beyond what the human eye is capable of but which is embedded with Veritae actuality, an image that is impossible in any format but digital, was shot with a Typhoon HD4 camera in an underwater housing.

The specs of the HD4 are remarkably humble, Not 4k, not 2k, not even 1080 but 720p on a single CMOS sensor. However that sensor has an astounding light sensitivity of 1000ASA and can shoot up to 1000 frames per second.

http://www.bigbluetech.net/big-blue-tech-news/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/typhoonhd4-05-07-09.jpghttp://www.wired.com/images_blogs/gadgetlab/2009/05/typhoonhd4-034.jpg

Is there anyone who doubts that it's just a matter of a time (short time at that) before we have such a camera capable of 2000fps at 4k??

Sometime ago I wrote a decidedly provocative piece entitled "I Love the look of Video" and in that article i observed that:

"I see chemical image of film and it just seems soft and dull and lifeless to me. I see the razor sharpness and the infinite flexibility of video, its density and dynamism and vibrancy and I think nothing but 'film is dead'.... I can't wait for the day we all 'get over it' and stop seeking to limit and curtail the evolution of the moving image and focus on exploiting its new properties."

In the above image we see yet another of those evolutionary steps. Once upon a time digital was a great leap forward in filmmaking logistics. But, at long last it seems we may have come to the true calling of digital as a great leap forward in aesthetics.




 
 
 


Controls